Amby Burfoot's Run Walk PlanBy Amby Burfoot and
Runner's World Magazine
A simple training technique that can increase
your endurance and calorie-burning, decrease injuries and maybe even help you
Shhhh. I've got a little secret to share with you.
You see, I used to be a fairly fast runner. In fact, a long time ago, I won the
Boston Marathon. And there's a certain amount of honor among Boston winners--a
code of steely toughness, a sort of "pain is my friend" ethic--that we're sworn
to uphold. .
Now, about that secret. I wouldn't want anyone to think
I've gone soft or anything but ... uh, this is kinda hard to get out ... I
often take walking breaks during my daily runs.
There, that feels
much better. Though I don't know why it was hard to say in the first place.
After all, it makes perfect sense to mix running and walking
Why You Should Mix Running and
- When new runners begin a running program,
they often start by following a run-walk routine. They run for maybe 30
seconds, walk until they feel recovered, then repeat the process for 20 to 30
minutes. This system has proven successful a thousand times over.
- When world-class runners peak for the
Olympics, they concentrate on "interval" training--the still-unsurpassed method
for achieving maximum results. They run hard for 1 to 5 minutes, then walk or
jog very slowly until they're ready to run hard again.
- When ultradistance runners participate in
those seemingly crazy races of 100 miles or six days (and beyond), they
inevitably alternate running and walking. Which only makes sense. It's hard to
imagine any other way to cover the mega-mile distances.
You, on the other hand, probably view walking as
the enemy. The thinking is: You run, and this is good. You are proving and
improving yourself; you are determined; you are a moral person. Whereas when
you walk, this is bad. You are lazy; you are a loser; you don't deserve to be
loved (not even by your mother).
Mental-health therapists have many
words for this sort of inflexible, perfectionist thinking, and I have one, too.
I call it "stupid." (None too nuanced, but has the benefit of clarity.)
The goal of a workout is not to avoid walking. This bears repeating: The
goal of a workout is not to avoid walking. The goals are to feel better, get in
better shape, reduce tension, lose weight, train for an upcoming race and so
on. Take your pick. They're all worthwhile goals.
And here's the
important thing: You can achieve these goals more easily if you incorporate
some walking into your running. I've been doing it for several years, and it
hasn't made me less of a runner. In fact, I used a heavy dose of run/walk
training to get ready for Boston this month.
Run/walk training, which
I like to call "R/W training," represents a simple, commonsense approach to
conditioning. It can help you train more (for better marathon preparation and
calorie-burning); it can help you train healthier (who needs injuries and
burnout?); and it can even help you get faster (through various forms of
Enough talk. Let's get more specific.
The Galloway Marathon
In recent years Jeff Galloway has pioneered the
idea of walking breaks during marathons. Jeff advocates this program not only
for many first-time marathoners, but also for those who have previously "hit
the wall" and experienced the crushing fatigue and depression of those last few
miles. By walking early and often, Jeff has found, most runners survive the
final miles in much better shape. They feel better, and they often run faster.
You can run/walk a marathon any way you want, but the simplest is to
run the first mile, then walk 60 seconds. Run the second mile, then walk 60
seconds (and enjoy a cup of sports drink). Repeat 24 more times, then hold your
head high and sprint like a banshee.
The Galloway run/walk marathon
has now been used successfully by thousands of marathoners. Jeff says it's
possible to run under 3:30 this way, and we know several runners who did so at
last fall's Chicago Marathon. But fast times aren't the point. The point is
that you can finish the marathon, you can feel good, you can run strong to the
end, and you can admire that gleaming finisher's medal for the rest of your
The Next Step In the Plan
The Galloway program has made many converts, and
I'm one of them. I've now run four marathons with walking breaks, in times
ranging from 3:45 to 4:30, and I'll run many more the same way. Walking breaks
have added confidence to my marathoning.
Since I'm a modest trainer
these days, averaging 20 to 30 miles a week, the marathon can easily intimidate
me. A few years ago, I was beginning to dread the thought of running
26.2-milers. Now I don't even think of the marathon that way. I think of it as
a 1-mile run that I just happen to repeat 26 times. Piece of cake.
R/W training has also made my daily training easier. Used to be that, much as I
love running, I sometimes felt too tired to get out the door. I talked myself
out of many workouts: When you're already tired, why drag yourself out on the
roads for 40 minutes?
I don't have this problem anymore. Because I
don't run for 40 minutes. I run for 4 minutes, then walk for a minute, then
repeat the process until I've completed 40 minutes. Okay, it's not the greatest
workout of all time, but so what? All I care about is getting in the workout
and feeling wonderfully energized afterward, which I always do.
A Step Backward
Let's pause for a moment to consider some of the
differences between running and walking. Some are small, others more
Running and walking do have much in common. Running is
basically fast walking, with this difference: runners "jump" from foot to foot,
walkers don't. When you run, the knee flexes more than in walking, the
quadriceps muscles contract, and you "toe off" in more or less the same way as
the long jumper who explodes off the jump board.
Because you toe off
and jump, you come down forcefully on the other foot. This is the infamous
"impact shock" of running--said to be two to three times your body weight--that
can lead to overuse injuries of the foot, knees, tendons and so on. Walkers
don't jump, so they are less likely to get injured.
But because you
jump, you can cover ground much faster than a walker and burn many more
calories per minute (because moving faster requires you to consume more
oxygen). In other words, you get a superior workout in less time, which is one
of the major benefits of running.
Unfortunately, many potential
runners never get into the rhythm of running, because it can be hard work. They
set out to run around the block a few times but find themselves breathless and
bedraggled at the first corner. Not a pretty sight. So they repair to the sofa
and never leave it again.
Or maybe they do try another time, but on
this next effort they decide to skip the running. They walk. It's hard to fail
at walking. But a leisurely stroll, while better than nothing at all, probably
doesn't produce as many health and fitness benefits. (See "Intense Benefits" on
These are the people who need to learn about R/W training.
They're already motivated to exercise; they just have to step up the pace a
little. Which is what a program of running and walking does. You won't get
exhausted and frustrated (thanks to the walking breaks), and you'll get all the
benefits that vigorous exercise brings (thanks to the running). Not a bad deal.
And there are many other runners and exercisers who should give R/W
training a try as well.
The Many Varieties of Run/Walk Training
Jeff Galloway has seized the moment with his
strategy of running/walking marathon races; indeed, R/W training has its most
obvious application in long runs. I've been doing this for several years, and
it works great.
I now do many of my long runs using a "9/1"
method--that is, I run for 9 minutes and walk for 1 minute. On a typical
out-and-back course, I head out for 60 minutes, then turn back toward home. Two
hours, nothing to it. When I want to increase my training prior to a marathon,
I just add another 9/1 segment on the outbound trip. Now the workout lasts 2
hours and 20 minutes, and I hardly notice the difference. Two weeks later, I do
2 hours and 40 minutes, and so on. In this buildup process, I stop at 3 hours.
Lest you think me a complete slacker, I often turn this long run into
a tempo workout on the way back. In the middle of each 9-minute run, I do a
3-minute pickup at close to my 10-K race pace. Since I do six running segments
every hour, this amounts to 18 minutes of tempo running in the last hour of my
long run. That's a quality day.
If you want to outdo me, fine.
Increase your pickups to 4, 5 or even 6 minutes during each 9-minute running
segment. Do six of these during the last hour of your long run, and I guarantee
this: You'll never again think that walking breaks make a workout wimpy. You'll
crawl up your front steps, desperate to remember where you stashed the energy
There are many other varieties of R/W training. And just as
many benefits. Some physical, some mental, all guaranteed to change (and
probably improve) your running. Here are a few:
easier: I've already mentioned this several times, but it can't be
overemphasized. All runners, from beginners to veteran marathoners, would like
to run longer and easier. The R/W system gives you a new tool to achieve this.
Does it come at a cost? Sure. Your overall workout is slower, so you get
slightly less training effect. But most times you run long to build overall
endurance and increase your body's ability to burn fat and calories in general.
A long R/W run does this just fine. (For pacing information, see "How Fast Are
You Going?" on page 50.)
Increased variety. Far too many runners do
the same workout at the same pace every time they run. It's boring, and it's
not a smart way to train. An R/W workout naturally has many small segments,
which encourages you to experiment. Yesterday, for example, I did an hour of
4/1 run/walking, and each 4-minute run was different. I did everything from 4
minutes very slow to a variety of 4-minute fartlek runs to 4 minutes at a hard,
Better speedwork. Same as the above, but with harder
effort. An R/W workout is an offshoot of the classic interval workout, so it's
easy to make it a real gut-buster. Here's one of my favorites, again built on
the 4/1 pattern. During each 4-minute running segment, jog for 1 minute, run
hard for 2 minutes and jog for 1 minute. Then do the 1-minute walk. Repeat this
eight times, and you've come reasonably close to the 8 x 400-meter interval
torture that my college coach loved to inflict on us.
On the topic of
intervals: Exercise physiologist Jack Daniels, Ph.D., recently had two groups
of women run three times a week, either continuously or with walking breaks.
After 12 weeks, the run/walk group was more fit. Why? "In effect, the walking
breaks turned the workouts into one big interval session," says Daniels. "It
allowed the women to go faster overall."
Fewer injuries. Walking
doesn't cause as many injuries as running, and R/W training shouldn't cause as
many either. No, I can't prove this, but it makes intuitive sense. Since
walking uses the leg muscles and connective tissues in a slightly different
manner than running, it should reduce overuse injuries. During R/W workouts, I
walk with a deliberately slow, elongated stride. This is quite a change from my
normally short, choppy running stride, and I can feel other muscles coming into
More sightseeing. What's the point of running in some gorgeous,
natural environment if all you see are the rocks and gnarly roots on the trail
right in front of you? Yet that's all many trail runners see, because they're
concentrating so hard on avoiding falls and twisted ankles. Take your new R/W
philosophy to the trails, however, and you can drink in those scenic overlooks
during your walking breaks.
More effective recovery days. This one's
easy and obvious. Some days you need to run slow. Maybe you ran long or fast
the previous day. Maybe you've been having a tough time in the office or at
home. You want to run, but you're not exactly bursting with mental or physical
energy. Try an R/W workout. You won't regret it.
You've had a sore knee, a bad Achilles or a nasty, week-long cold. You're ready
to get back into your training routine but want to make sure you don't overdo
it and suffer a setback. A series of progressive R/W workouts may do the trick.
Try a couple of 2/1 workouts, then a couple of 3/1 runs, and keep building.
Listen to your body, and don't run farther or faster than what feels right.
More quality time. My wife runs, but my teenage kids don't. They do
all the other stuff kids do--soccer, computers, tae kwon do--but probably
wouldn't make it through a steady 30-minute run. They will, however, do an R/W
workout with us. We pick something easy, keep it relatively short, yak like
crazy and enjoy the time together.
The part of run/walk training that I find most
appealing--the mental breaks provided by the brief walking periods--won't prove
equally compelling to all runners. Many will staunchly resist. "I didn't start
running to become a walker," they'll snort. Or something to that effect. We
runners succeeded as runners because we're an extremely determined, motivated
breed, and we don't take easily to anything that smacks of laziness or
Okay. I understand that. Old habits die hard. And R/W
training isn't for everyone. Or for every workout. I do it a couple of times a
week. Usually when I run by myself. Often as a long run.
this is the most surprising thing--I've found that it has motivated me to do
more speedwork and tempo training. That's because R/W training is so close to
classic interval training that it seems to nudge me in that direction. In fact,
you could simply say that R/W training is classic interval training that's been
liberated from the track and allowed to roam wherever you want to take it.
Free at last. All you have to do is let yourself "think outside the box,"
and you just might discover an entirely new, enjoyable (and effective) way to
run. It's worth a try, isn't it?
There's no doubt about it: high-intensity exercise
produces greater health benefits than low-intensity exercise. Real benefits, as
in lowered mortality and heart-disease risk. Which isn't to say walking does
nothing for you (it does). Running simply does more, as two major studies have
proven recently: On mortality risk: Regular vigorous activity reduced mortality
risk significantly among 17,000 men in the Harvard Alumni Study, according to
an April 1995 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Nonvigorous activity (walking, for instance) had no such effect on mortality.
The Harvard researchers found that the difference in mortality risk between
those who did vigorous exercise and those who did very little was the same
difference in mortality risk as those who were of ideal weight versus those who
were at least 20 percent over their ideal weight. On heart-disease risk: Among
men, high-intensity exercise has a positive effect on all heart-disease
factors, according to a German study of 12,000 people published last fall.
Cholesterol and triglyceride levels, blood pressure, heart rate and body
weight. All were improved by intense exercise. Among women in the study,
high-intensity exercise was associated with lowered blood pressure, heart rate
and body weight. For both men and women in the study, low-intensity exercise
had far less effect on risk factors and, in some cases, had no effect at all.
How Fast Are You Going?
Most runners want to keep track of their pace.
It's how we measure many workouts. So what happens to your overall pace when
you combine running and walking? You slow down, obviously. But not as much as
you might think. The following table shows per-mile paces for someone who runs
a mile at his or her normal pace, then walks for 60 seconds before running the
next mile. These estimates assume that you walk at a steady (but not fast) pace
between running efforts.
|If you run a mile in... (Col.
and then walk 60 seconds,
your overall pace will be...(Col. B)
Amby Burfoot, the editor of
Runner's World, has run well over
100,000 miles and hopes to run many more.